Some information before we move on. My app is chapi, the frontend is built with Vue with tailwind for styling and the server is written in Go.
The entire Javascript bundle is compiled with the Go server, so i can run the entire app as a single binary.
When i pushed it to a production environment the static assets took an incredible amount of time to load, sometimes taking as long as five or six seconds; this is where my journey into increasing the performance of the app began.
First tailwind. Tailwind is large but it also provides purging, basically a way to remove the css classes you're not using in your app. Without configuring purging my CSS bundle was a massive 3000+kilobyes
and with purging it dropped to 100+kilobytes
(Not fantastic perhaps, but much better than 3MB
). This small step offered significant improvement but i was curious to know how far i could push this.
I stumbled upon Cache-Control
header on MDN.
Cache-Control: max-age=86400
From reading the MDN article adding the header above when serving static assets from my Go backend would suffice. The max-age=86400
sets the content to be valid for 24 hours, after that it becomes stale and fetches again.
Worthy of note though is that while debugging Response headers using Chrome dev tools i noticed that Google uses Cache-Control: max-age=86400 stale-while-revalidate=604800
for google fonts responses.
This particular value isn't documented on the great MDN docs but here's a page i found that explains it
Google stale-while-revalidate.
The gist of it though is that if the cache isn't stale yet based on max-age
set. The browser simply fulfills the request using the cache and does nothing with the stale-while-revalidte
value, but if it's stale then the stale-while-revalidate
value checks if the stale response is still within the time it covers. If it is then it still serves the cached response while also non obtrusively revalidating the cache and updating if necessary.
Basically, the advantage of this is that if the cache is stale you don't have to wait like you would.
This would be enough but i run an Nginx server in front of my Go server. So following another great article Nginx Caching, i added the following configuration.
proxy_cache_path /home/chidi/Work/nginx_cache levels=1:2 keys_zone=nginx_cache:10m max_size=5g inactive=10m use_temp_path=off;
server {
listen 80 default_server;
listen [::]:80 default_server;
location / {
# First attempt to serve request as file, then
# as directory, then fall back to displaying a 404.
# proxy_redirect http://localhost/ http://localhost:5000/;
proxy_cache nginx_cache;
proxy_cache_revalidate on;
proxy_cache_use_stale error timeout http_500 http_502 http_503 http_504;
proxy_pass http://localhost:5000;
}
}
The Nginx article goes into greater detail about what the proxy_*
directives do. But to summarize what the Nginx configuration does:
proxy_cache_path
sets the location of the cache on the machine.proxy_cache
sets the cache to useproxy_cache_revalidate
This revalidates the asset against the origin server if the asset has become staleproxy_cache_use_stale
Returns the cached file if the origin server returns a specified5**
error.proxy_pass
proxies requests from the listened port to the provided port
NOTE The proxy_cache_use_stale
was a bit of a controversial decision tbh. See the files built with VueJS are always hashed, e.g dashboard-<random string>.js
. And on every new build the js file for dashboard will change but the browser will still receive the old content because of this. I still took the tradeoff though because the Frontend has come to a stable version and the max-age
set on Cache-Control
it'll get revalidated and then updated every 24 hrs.
And that's that! With these changes i was able to see some really good improvements on my app.